what idea was espoused with the webster hayne debates
February 14, 2021 - by where is casey anthony now in 2021
So what was this debate really about? Webster stood in favor of Connecticut's proposal that the federal government should stop surveying western land and sell the land it had already surveyed to boost it's revenue and strengthen it's authority. It is not the creature of state Legislatures; nay, more, if the whole truth must be told, the people brought it into existence, established it, and have hitherto supported it, for the very purpose, amongst others, of imposing certain salutary restraints on state sovereignties. . . South Carolinas Declaration of the Causes of Secession (1860), Jefferson Daviss Inaugural Address (1861), Documents in Detail: The Webster-Hayne Debates, Remarks in Congress on the Tariff of Abominations, Check out our collection of primary source readers. They switched from a. the tariff of 1828 to national power . The discussion took a wide range, going back to topics that had agitated the country before the Constitution was formed. South Carolinas Declaration of the Causes of Sece Distribution of the Slave Population by State. The United States, under the Constitution and federal government, was a single, unified nation, not a coalition of sovereign states. The Webster Hayne Debate. Inflamed and mortified at this repulse, Hayne soon returned to the assault, primed with a two-day speech, which at great length vaunted the patriotism of South Carolina and bitterly attacked New England, dwelling particularly upon her conduct during the late war. It is only by a strict adherence to the limitations imposed by the Constitution on the federal government, that this system works well, and can answer the great ends for which it was instituted. . It is one from which we are not disposed to shrink, in whatever form or under whatever circumstances it may be pressed upon us. To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member. Hayne entered the U.S. Senate in 1823 and soon became prominent as a spokesman for the South and for the . We had no other general government. [O]pinions were expressed yesterday on the general subject of the public lands, and on some other subjects, by the gentleman from South Carolina [Senator Robert Hayne], so widely different from my own, that I am not willing to let the occasion pass without some reply. . Daniel Webster, in a dramatic speech, showed the danger of the states' rights doctrine, which permitted each State to decide for itself which laws were unconstitutional, claiming it would lead to civil war. . He entered the Senate on that memorable day with a slow and stately step and took his seat as though unconscious of the loud buzz of expectant interest with which the crowded auditory greeted his appearance. Webster scoffed at the idea of consolidation, labeling it "that perpetual cry, both of terror and delusion." What Hayne and his supporters actually meant to do, Webster claimed, was to resist those means that might strengthen the bonds of common interest. The speech is also known for the line Liberty and union, now and forever, one and inseparable, which would subsequently become the state motto of North Dakota, appearing on the state seal. Correspondence Between Anthony Butler and Presiden State of the Union Address Part II (1846). Since as Vice President and President of the Senate, Calhoun could not take place in the debate, Hayne represented the pro-nullification point-of-view. I did not utter a single word, which any ingenuity could torture into an attack on the slavery of the South. It was of a partizan and censorious character and drew nearly all the chief senators out. . The Most Famous Senate Speech January 26, 1830 The debate began simply enough, centering on the seemingly prosaic subjects of tariff and public land policy. So they could finish selling the lands already surveyed. . On that system, Ohio and Carolina are different governments, and different countries, connected here, it is true, by some slight and ill-defined bond of union, but, in all main respects, separate and diverse. His ideas about federalism and his interpretation of the Constitution as a document uniting the states under one supreme law were highly influential in the eyes of his contemporaries and would influence the rebuilding of the nation after the Civil War. The idea that a state could nullify a federal law, associated with South Carolina, especially after the publication of John C. Calhouns South Carolina Exposition and Protest (1828) in response to the tariff passed in that year. I propose to consider it, and to compare it with the Constitution. T he Zionist-evangelical back story goes back several decades, with 90-year-old televangelist Pat Robertson being a prime case study.. One of the more notable "coincidences" or anomalies Winter Watch brings to your attention is the image of Robertson on the cover of Time magazine in 1986 back before the public was red pilled by the Internet -as the pastor posed with a gesture called . I understand him to maintain this right, as a right existing under the Constitution; not as a right to overthrow it, on the ground of extreme necessity, such as would justify violent revolution. They significantly declare, that it is time to calculate the value of the Union; and their aim seems to be to enumerate, and to magnify all the evils, real and imaginary, which the government under the Union produces. Well, the southern states were infuriated. It was not a Union to be torn up without bloodshed; for nerves and arteries were interwoven with its roots and tendrils, sustaining the lives and interests of twelve million inhabitants. It was motivated by a dispute over the continued sale of western lands, an important source of revenue for the federal government. These debates transformed into a national crisis when South Carolina threatened . Sir, I may be singularperhaps I stand alone here in the opinion, but it is one I have long entertained, that one of the greatest safeguards of liberty is a jealous watchfulness on the part of the people, over the collection and expenditure of the public moneya watchfulness that can only be secured where the money is drawn by taxation directly from the pockets of the people. This is a delicate and sensitive point, in southern feeling; and of late years it has always been touched, and generally with effect, whenever the object has been to unite the whole South against northern men, or northern measures. Enrolling in a course lets you earn progress by passing quizzes and exams. Webster realized that if the social, political, and economic elite of Massachusetts and the Northeast were to once again lay claim to national leadership, he had to justify New England's previous history of sectionalism within a framework of nationalistic progression. The states cannot now make war; they cannot contract alliances; they cannot make, each for itself, separate regulations of commerce; they cannot lay imposts; they cannot coin money. He must say to his followers [members of the state militia], defend yourselves with your bayonets; and this is warcivil war. . This statement, though strong, is no stronger than the strictest truth will warrant. . I feel like its a lifeline. . The Webster-Hayne debate was a famous debate in the United States between Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina.It happened on January 19-27, 1830. Webster spoke in favor of the proposed pause of federal surveyance of western land, representing the North's interest in selling the western land, which had already been surveyed. What started as a debate over the Tariff of Abominations soon morphed into debates over state and federal sovereignty and liberty and disunion. For the next several days, the men traded speeches which contemporaries of the time described as the greatest orations ever delivered in the Senate. The Confederation was, in strictness, a compact; the states, as states, were parties to it. By means of missionaries and political tracts, the scheme was in a great measure successful. Certainly, sir, I am, and ever have been of that opinion. . The arena selected for a first impression was the Senate, where the arch-heretic himself presided and guided the onset with his eye. . I will struggle while I have life, for our altars and our fire sides, and if God gives me strength, I will drive back the invader discomfited. A speech by Louisiana Senator Edward Livingston, however, neatly explains how American nationhood encompasses elements of both Webster and Hayne's ideas. - Definition and Uses, Public Speaking: Assignment 1 - Informative Speech, Public Speaking: Assignment 3 - Special Occasion Speech, The Role of Probability Distributions, Random Numbers & the Computer in Simulations, The Monte Carlo Simulation: Scope & Common Applications, Working Scholars Bringing Tuition-Free College to the Community, The methods by which the federal government earned its revenue, The federal government's surveying and selling of land west of the Mississippi River, The issue of slavery, which was beginning to divide the Northern and Southern states, The balance of power between federal and state governments. For Calhoun, see the Speech on Abolition Petitions and the Speech on the Oregon Bill. There was no winner or loser in the Webster-Hayne debate. It moves vast bodies, and gives to them one and the same direction. . I understand the gentleman to maintain, that, without revolution, without civil commotion, without rebellion, a remedy for supposed abuse and transgression of the powers of the general government lies in a direct appeal to the interference of the state governments. foote wanted to stop surveying lands until they could sell the ones already looked at . Even Benton, whose connection with the debate made him at first belittle these grand utterances, soon felt the danger and repudiated the company of the nullifiers. Daniel webster, in a dramatic speech, showed the. Prejudice Not Natural: The American Colonization "What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July? We could not send them back to the shores from whence their fathers had been taken; their numbers forbade the thought, even if we did not know that their condition here is infinitely preferable to what it possibly could be among the barren sands and savage tribes of Africa; and it was wholly irreconcilable with all our notions of humanity to tear asunder the tender ties which they had formed among us, to gratify the feelings of a false philanthropy. This will co-operate with the feelings of patriotism to induce a state to avoid any measures calculated to endanger that connection. If these opinions be thought doubtful, they are, nevertheless, I trust, neither extraordinary nor disrespectful. It has always been regarded as a matter of domestic policy, left with the states themselves, and with which the federal government had nothing to do. Sir, if we are, then vain will be our attempt to maintain the Constitution under which we sit. The gentleman, therefore, only follows out his own principles; he does no more than arrive at the natural conclusions of his own doctrines; he only announces the true results of that creed, which he has adopted himself, and would persuade others to adopt, when he thus declares that South Carolina has no interest in a public work in Ohio. . Tariff of 1816 History & Significance | What was the Tariff of 1816? He remained a Southern Unionist through his long public career and a good type of the growing class of statesman devoted to slave interests who loved the Union as it was and doted upon its compromises. . Ah! flashcard sets. . Do they mean, or can they mean, anything more than that the Union of the states will be strengthened, by whatever continues or furnishes inducements to the people of the states to hold together? Democratic Party Platform 1860 (Breckinridge Facti (Southern) Democratic Party Platform Committee. . The significance of Daniel Webster's argument went far beyond the immediate proposal at hand. On January 19, 1830, Hayne attacked the Foot Resolution and labeled the Northeasterners as selfish and unprincipled for their support of protectionism and conservative land policies. We are ready to make up the issue with the gentleman, as to the influence of slavery on individual and national characteron the prosperity and greatness, either of the United States, or of particular states. I said, only, that it was highly wise and useful in legislating for the northwestern country, while it was yet a wilderness, to prohibit the introduction of slaves: and added, that I presumed, in the neighboring state of Kentucky, there was no reflecting and intelligent gentleman, who would doubt, that if the same prohibition had been extended, at the same early period, over that commonwealth, her strength and population would, at this day, have been far greater than they are. sir, this is but the old story. The Webster-Hayne debate was a series of spontaneous speeches delivered before the Senate in 1830. The honorable member himself is not, I trust, and can never be, one of these. When they shall become dissatisfied with this distribution, they can alter it. Web hardcover $30.00 paperback $17.00 kindle nook book ibook. . Its like a teacher waved a magic wand and did the work for me. I understand him to insist, that if the exigency of the case, in the opinion of any state government, require it, such state government may, by its own sovereign authority, annul an act of the general government, which it deems plainly and palpably unconstitutional. The Senate debates between Whig Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Democrat Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina in January 1830 started out as a disagreement over the sale of Western lands and turned into one of the most famous verbal contests in American history. . [Its leader] would have a knot before him, which he could not untie. Congress could only recommendtheir acts were not of binding force, till the states had adopted and sanctioned them. [2] We deal in no abstractions. When, however, the gentleman proceeded to contrast the state of Ohio with Kentucky, to the disadvantage of the latter, I listened to him with regret. Would it be safe to confide such a treasure to the keeping of our national rulers? Webster spoke in favor of the proposed pause of federal surveyance of western land, representing the North's interest in selling the western land, which had already been surveyed. Sir, when the gentleman provokes me to such a conflict, I meet him at the threshold. Sir, I deprecate and deplore this tone of thinking and acting. I hold it to be a popular government, erected by the people; those who administer it responsible to the people; and itself capable of being amended and modified, just as the people may choose it should be. They have agreed, that certain specific powers shall be exercised by the federal government; but the moment that government steps beyond the limits of its charter, the right of the states to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits the authorities, rights, and liberties, appertaining to them,[7] is as full and complete as it was before the Constitution was formed.